Stash or splash? Lawmakers ask NASA to find alternatives for International Space Station
https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/05/iss_stash_or_splash/
US lawmakers have asked NASA to explore storing the International Space Station in a higher orbit at the end of its operational life, instead of dumping it into the ocean. The idea could extend the station’s value, keeping it as an orbital lab or a bridge to future infrastructure. A study would weigh costs, safety, and engineering challenges of an elevated retirement, plus how to limit space debris and fund the plan. Supporters say a higher orbit could preserve scientific work and international partnerships, while buying time for a successor. Critics warn of higher fuel needs, more complex operations, and the risk of an uncontrolled deorbit. Either way, it signals a shift in how we think about retiring big assets in space. If NASA weighs a high orbit retirement, it could reshape how we manage large space assets—balancing science value against safety and cost. The discussion invites a longer view of space infrastructure, not just a splashdown. It’s a reminder that our decisions today steer what we can build tomorrow in orbit.